Showing the pin connections on the module screen in Version 5 is really nice.  However, not showing all of the available I/O makes it difficult to see how pins are shared between different channel types. For example, you may not realize that you could simply move a DOUT to a different channel assignment (i.e. DOUT:F rather than DOUT:I) to allow for an additional COUT that shares a pin assignment with DOUT:I (ref XA2 module).  Is it possible to have the option to show all the I/O like before, but keep the pin connections displayed?

I would like to see the G11 module added as a device to connect with via internet through IQAN ANALYZE similar to how RUN and DESIGN currently have the option. This would be a very useful tool for diagnosing issues in the field for customers that have the G11 but do not have a CAN sniffer available. 

The G11 has been a very useful tool for me and i would like to see its capabilities expanded. 

Adapting the MC4x modules on our first machines now, we had quite a struggle with the various pin characteristics (DIN Pull-up / Down, A15/17 suitable for relays on the MC3, et cetera). Such details can be found in the Specs of course, but it would be quicker & easier if we can see such details in IQAN Design, for example in the bottom-right corner when clicking an in- or output pin.

Hello,

Are there any thoughts about integrating some kind of map app to the MD4?

Like google maps or something for navigation?

For example:

-Add a GPS device in the machine and then add some kind of map function in iqan design for the MD4.

-Connect a smartphone to the IQAN system and use the phones gps to show location in some kind of app on the MD4. Or maybe stream the phones map interface on the MD4.

Just some thoughts and ideas. Not high priority.

Regards

Fredrik Forsberg

For consistency reasons and short labels, you may have adjust items ( parameters ) with the same name in different adjust groups.

When in Iqan run reviewing actual settings it becomes impossible to know which one you are looking for,

My proposal is to have a possibility to organise the adjust items in the same way as in IQAN design adjust groups.

Hello,

It would be great if IQAN allowed for Byte Order (Intel/Motorola) to be used on messages that are less then multiples of full bytes. Currently byte order can only be applied on 8/16/32 bit messages, but in some instances we may have a 12 or 14 bit message that requires endianess. We need to do some magic to reorder the bits before sending them, which is a pain.

For example, it is not possible in Parker to send the messages below with different byte orders, as they are not full-bytes.

I am doing a bunch with functional groups in the latest project to clean things up a bit, and it is annoying to have to individually name/rename each of the FGIs, especially when I change the name of the source and then "have to" rename it again in every Funtional Group where it shows up.
Maybe have a box to check to override the default name strategy for the times someone might want another name used.

Hi,

There is any plan to have a programming block to allow writing multiple external value. For example, update value to multiple parameters with the same Qcode. Actually, we have to write 1 block for 1 output.

It could be very interesting to be able to link external variable to be updated with this function block.

Thanks,

David

Is there a way to export the pin list to an excel-friendly format?

The list is superb to use when making for example wiring cross-reference list.

I know of the Tools-->Project documentation but going to pdf and then to excel is not always so efficient .