I have learned to use Qcode and its great tool to make your program more simple.
However, I noticed that when you add many functions inside same channel (like MAC),
the Component Count value in Project statics increases a lot even it should be less than before? Example before I had 5 different MAC channel what I add in same MAC channel using Qcode, still Component Count value increased even it should be less than before?
When you want to optimize your program running power what method gives best result;
-Add many functions in same channel or keeps functions separate in own channels?
Merry Christmas to everyone! :)
24962 Remove 30 day limit on evaluation license
You can use the tools without a license as long as you like. The functional limitations are still there though, the tools are limited to simulation only.
For more details see:
The jpins are configured for error checking, 0 error value.
The jfin is red with an unassigned error.
I think maybe this is caused by how I made a new function group and a new j1939 module, but I perhaps have not linked them correctly, or does this sound like another issue?
I checked through some of the forums to see a similar issue, and I saw a person had disabled the error checking as a workaround. I am hoping not to do that.
in some situations when a connection with a PC or modem is not an option, customer need to give the driver/enduser access through the display to certain adjust, measure or log items.
To have a kind of restriction or limitation, it would be nice if this access could be limited in time.
If the Pin code channel would accept integer values, the Pin could be a function of the actual date or other values. So if someone calls in with a problem, the service engineer at the OEM can do some mental arithmetics. In case of a date based Pin-Code it will be void on the next day.
Is there a way to change the icon color for conditional messages? I'm getting Red for 'Warning' and yellow for 'Alarm'. Since Alarm is higher than warning, I'd rather the Alarm be red and the warning be yellow....
The biggest reason why it is difficult to re-organize a code after the fact are all the external references of the objects. If we decide to move them into a new or existing function group to help clean-up the code all those connections are lost and we need hours to re-create them. That is if we where smart enough to first identify them. More specifically I am referring to:
It would be so much nicer if those connections could be kept.
-Design latest version
-When using linear or circular bar the program crash down
-Only fixing by removing these elements
I believe these elements animation cause this because when bar animation goes to end then program will crash. Can you disable animation from these elements?
On a original Tigercat vehicule ,
We can find :one MD3 ,one XA2 , one XS2. The Md3 send (TSC1 : SAE J 1939 frame) and receive SAE J1939 from the ECU.
see the original drawing:
My custumer want to add one MD3 and one MC2 in the tigercat to drive one other accessories
My VIN must accelerate the engine and my proportionnal outputs. ( automotive system )
We would to like a new MD3 ( MD3(2) ) send a TSC1 (SAE J 1936 frame) and the old MD3 receive SAE J 1939 frame CAN . We have affraid that the engine received 2 TSC1 message and the engine stop !!! ( conflict !!!!!! )
I don't have the original program of the vehicule (picture (1) MD3, XA2, XS2).
Do you have a solution for stop the TSC1 transmission on the original MD3 or other solution?
Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions .
I need to find the best method to do a sequencial communication.
Actually I need to send canopen packet in order and I need to respect this order.
As I can have multiple item, required or not (enabled/disabled) to send.
For example, with a scanreco remote control LCD screen I need to :
- Clear screen
- Activate FrameID of each component required to be visible on the screen
- after this I'll need to update each FrameID value with a 250ms timing.
Actually I was able to do this for testing purpose, but the program is a bit messy.
Sequential safety validation. Each step need to be validated in a specific sequence and in case of condition lost, I'll need to start again from the first step.
- Press "bypass" mode status on the screen
- Open the fence (Signal OFF)
- Close the fence (Signal ON
- Open the door (Signal OFF)
- Close the door (Signal ON)
- Activating bypass activated signal
In case of lost of the fence or door signal, I need to restart from the beginning this sequence.
I have in mind to use IDC + counter to do this, but I'm not sure to be in the right way.
I'm looking if you have example or recommendation to do this ?
I'm sure you notice that it's my very first project!
Customer support service by UserEcho