I'm thinking about controlling a motorized hydraulic pressure relief valve (the motor turns the pressure setting in and out) with two COUTs on an XA2 module. The motor was previously controlled with a couple of digital outputs and relays as an H-bridge. This is more of a XA2 hardware question; are the diodes necessary to protect the high side COUT as shown?:
Obviously only running either COUT A or COUT B at a time.
Or are diodes not needed?:
This is a two part question regarding the criticality of VREFs for IQAN Modules. We use an MD4 and XA2 in our system. On the XA2, we use VREF to support a three axis joystick and one pressure transducer (4 VINs).
We received a report from the field that a short circuit between VREF and ground caused the XA2 module to fail completely resulting in "I/O No Contact" IQAN Error Message on the MD4.
Is this a typical or expected failure mode for an XA2 with a damaged 5V reference voltage regulator? Or is it more likely there was a mis-diagnosis from the field? I can't think of a way to validate this without destroying an otherwise healthy XA2.
Would this also be the case in an MC42?
Hi to all
Is it possible to connect the terminal W of the engine alternator to terminal C1:24 "Frequency In" of the XA2?
The diesel engine work at 24V , it is an old engine and don't has the J1939 bus.
XA2 No contact error. The led indications on the XA2 module are fine. All XA2 modules after this module on the expansion bus has status OK. Could Anyone point out what is going on here Please?
Pardon me if this information is already readily available but am having trouble finding it.
If the wiring for an XA2 DOUT is shorted to battery is there an internal protection strategy in the module that will protect the XA2 from being damage?
I'd like to have IQAN control be paralleled with switch control. This specific application will be a drop axle. I want the IQAN to drop the axle in certain situations, and have a switch that will drop it at any time, even if the control system is powered down,
I believe I have to protect the module from back-feeding, correct? Will just diode protection be enough or do I need to have the Dout controlling a relay that would toggle the input between the switch and a +bat source?
Would any problems arise from supplying Parker Pulsar valves with a digital out signal instead of a PWM signal if proportionality is not desired? We're using an XA2.
Would a clamping diode be necessary in this configuration?
Why must a PWM output be wired as shown below in the XA2 manual?
When I've worked with mobile style PLC's in the past: It's just 1 pin for an output that delivers a PWM signal to a solenoid, then the other pole of the solenoid is wired to a common ground.
Why must there be three pins involved for this? Why shouldn't you wire one pole of the solenoids to a common ground (same potential as battery negative)?
Thanks in advance.
I have encountered a problem with DOUT on XA2 modules. We operate several Parker D1VW (NG6) valve, with multiple XA2 modules. Some DOUT (from different XA2) does not activate the magnet coil, although it looks completely correct when I'm connected to IQAN Design . DOUT = Tru.
We use valve contacts with zener diodes, it works on most DOUT otherwise. I had to change the output to PWM instead and then it works without a problem. Is there any problem with the XA2 modules, or are the Zener diodes that do not work against XA2?
Due to a voltage drop in the system, because of an electric fan switching on, all the voltage inputs give a low error.
The strange thing is that the voltage drop is not so big. it drops from 27 to 22 for only a sec due to the high start current of the fan.
Is this normal, I thought the modules could be used in 12 VDC system also. So the voltage drop should not be a problem.
Customer support service by UserEcho